Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2007011, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Jaimie Vernon" <bullseyecanada@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: All You Need Is "Love"
Date Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:59:11 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain (4.5 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

AT Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:09:27 synth wrote:

>*Maybe I've heard more remix albums than some here, but I still don't hear 
>any correlation >between a cheesy novelty song like Stars on 45 and a remix 
>album on the level of Love.

The "Stars On 45" comparison was someone else's analogy but I think it 
applies mainly because this ISN'T really straight-up remix album. My full 
feeling about the "Love" album is explained below. It's cut from my blog but 
I think appropo to discussions here as a lot of people picked 'Love' for 
their year end. I don't want to initiate a cat-fight but welcome discussion 
based on my points:

Initially I was apprehensive about the Martins deconstructing the master 
works of such sacred cows even though I don't hold The Beatles up to such 
standards. Yes, I'm a huge fan and as such realized years ago that these are 
just good songs recorded by four pretty fallible human beings...but I 
digress.

What gets under my craw with this disc isn't the fact that the songs have 
become faddish and trendy mash-ups in a style made popular in recent years 
by wanna-be engineering hacks, but that the mash-up trend itself is a 
one-trick novelty that does not hold up under repeated scrutiny and so the 
Beatles tracks suffer because of it.

Imagine if you will trying to watch two different television shows at the 
same time side-by-side...or even worse, watching them superimposed over top 
of each other. Now imagine this Andy Warholian experiment featuring five or 
SIX television shows super-imposed on top of each other.

This is the cumulative effect of the Beatles' "Love".

The Martins have given "Within You And Without You" a drum loop....not 
mechanical, but organic by placing the drums from "Tomorrow Never Knows" 
into the mix. Similarly, "Here Comes The Sun" now comes with the tabla 
groove of "The Inner Light". Despite the sounds being original to the Holy 
Beatles Canon, they are, at the end of the day...still drum loops. And are 
completely out of context. And maybe that's my beef with the mash-up 
phenomenon. Context. The trend itself relies heavily on the clever irony of 
making disparate works seem "related". I get that. It just sounds like so 
much bad static because what no one really wants to admit is that despite 
rock and roll being its own blueprint for self-parody, the subtle turns it 
takes to get where it's going makes it more different rather than similar. 
And it's friggin' distracting. And I come from a generation that *ISN'T* 
A.D.D.

Make no mistake...the mix on this disc brings to light the fact that The 
Beatles material is still, above all else, some of the greatest songs ever 
recorded. I mean just hearing the bass lines in "Hey Jude" isolated in the 
mix for the first time -- finally vindicating Harrison as the musician 
McCartney refused to acknowledge! -- is worth the price of admission alone. 
Or the demo-to-finished master composite of "Strawberry Fields" which failed 
to impress on the Anthology discs now seems relevent and fresh. Or the NEW 
string arrangement on the early take of "While My Guitar Gently Weeps".

In fact, had this been a straight remix record there would be no doubt in 
ANYONE's mind (including fans of the rival Rolling Stones) that this was The 
Beatles best album...EVER. The sheer clarity and presence of tracks like 
"Eleanor Rigby", "Yesterday" and "Something" confirms their majesty as grand 
accomplishments of production genius to which George Martin rightly deserves 
the applause. And it also points out the band's weak links (hearing the 
out-of-tune backing vocals on "Help!" in 5.1 is a little jarring).

But again, the novelty of meticulously placing puked up snippets of sound 
all over these audio Mona Lisa's makes me wish I had a bottle of ProTools 
Windex so I could go back and take the offending neon road signs off the 
pristine highway these songs nearly traveled on.

Oh, and I completely grasp the concept that all of this is the soundtrack to 
a stage performance to which I told my wife: "We'll go back to Vegas the 
minute the Cirque leaves Nevada".

Here's hoping The Beatles pass the torch to Giles Martin to actually remix 
the Beatles records appropriately and leave all the trendiness on the 
cutting room floor. After all, The Beatles MADE things trendy...they didn't 
follow them.

Jaimie Vernon,
Bullseye

_________________________________________________________________
Your Space. Your Friends. Your Stories. Share your world with Windows Live 
Spaces. http://discoverspaces.live.com/?loc=en-CA


Message Index for 2007011, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help