smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | synthhtnys@comcast.net |
| Subject | Re: Tops of 2006? |
| Date | Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:09:27 +0000 |
[Part 1 text/plain (1.0 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
*Maybe I've heard more remix albums than some here, but I still don't hear any correlation between a cheesy novelty song like Stars on 45 and a remix album on the level of Love.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Jaimie Vernon" <bullseyecanada@hotmail.com>
> At Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:14:44 synth wrote:
>
> > > 3. The Beatles - Love
> > > (Pretty cool - Falls dangerously close to Stars On 45
> > > territory
> >
> >
> >Whaaaaaaaaat? Stars on 45?
> >It's not even in the same continent, much less dangerously close!
> >...unless of course that was supposed to be some kind of zen koan.
>
> Actually....I gotta agree with the "Stars On 45" analogy. Nice pastiche
> novelty what with Ringo's own drum parts being used as a loop in other
> songs. I've listened to this 6 times and now I'm bored with it. Most of the
> stand-alone straight remixes are great, but the mash-up idea is incongruous
> without seeing the visuals it's supposed to be supporting.
Jaimie Vernon,
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.