smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | Marty Rudnick <mrudnick@marturo.com> |
Subject | Re: Top 10 numbers for 2006 vs. How can (X) possibly not be on their |
Date | Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:06:47 -0800 (PST) |
[Part 1 text/plain utf-8 (0.5 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Yeah, it's sad, isn't it? Not that it's any of your business...
Marty
---- <audities@smoe.org> wrote:
>
> How anyone could get through the year without 69 is beyond me! And
> not even an honorable mention!
>
> g
>
> -- audities-owner@smoe.org wrote:
>
> This was especially difficult, because I didn't use all the numbers
> this year.
>
> 10. 4
> 9. 18
> 8. 17
> 7. 9
> 6. 6
> 5. 34
> 4. 8
> 3. 1
> 2. 3
> 1. 56
>
> Marty
>
>
>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.