Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2006074, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Stewart Mason" <craigtorso@verizon.net>
Subject Re: Musical Cultural Question
Date Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:40:09 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@ameritech.net>
> As for my generation -- those three work, certainly
> based on their pervasive success.  I guess Madonna,
> Ramones and Prince didn't make the cut.

With every passing year, it's more obvious that THRILLER was more of a 
socio-cultural phenomenon than it was an Important Record.  It's a 
great album, but it's a fluke on the level of the Rubik's Cube. 
Although I generally prefer Prince myself, I would argue that Madonna 
is the one who belongs on that list:  unlike Michael, who flamed out 
artistically starting with the Jacksons' VICTORY album, Madonna 
remained musically and culturally relevant up through 1998's RAY OF 
LIGHT, and it's only been with the last couple of albums that she's 
turned into an embarrassing has-been trying to recapture past glories.

Nirvana, I have the same qualms some other folks have raised, but I'm 
willing to buy the argument.  U2, I would grant simply because they 
were trying so very hard for the Spokemen Of Their Generation mantle.

S


Message Index for 2006074, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help