smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | Joe Rivera <joer@stereojoe.com> |
Subject | Re: 4.5 out of 5 - I'll take it. The Elms |
Date | Mon, 08 May 2006 17:27:11 -0700 |
[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (1.0 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
No, I didn't realize Thom, was *the* Thom.
But, I still would say I find the record awful - though perhaps I should
qualify that by saying I find it awful when considering the band's
catalog. If it was a different band I might think otherwise, but it's
not what I expected from the band at all and thought I'd warn the list
that this one falls into the "sample before you buy" category. I've
played it close to a dozen times and it's just not sticking to me -
simply a style I don't care for and would not have listened to if it
were not attached to The Elms name.
You nailed it with the comparison to Tsar's latest, and I'll throw in Ok
Go's Oh No to that mix.
joe
Greg York wrote:
>> From: Joe Rivera
>> I've had this for a couple months now - it's AWFUL, IMO
> Wow! How's that for direct feedback to the artist? Maybe Joe doesn't
> know that Thom is a member of the Elms? But on the other hand,
> nothing wrong with honest opinions I guess.
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.