Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2006042, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Michael Roux" <mroux5@insightbb.com>
Subject Re: Major labels asking 10% of artist's concerts revenues in Brazil
Date Sun, 9 Apr 2006 07:28:55 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

It makes sense to me.  I wonder what took so long.

Michael


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rafael Paulino Neto" <rpaulino@bignet.com.br>
To: <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 9:55 PM
Subject: Major labels asking 10% of artist's concerts revenues in Brazil


> I've been taken by surprise with an article on Folha de São Paulo, one
> of  Brasil's most influential newspapers, about major labels trying to
> charge 10% of concerts revenues from their artists. All the major
> 'brazilian' labels (Universal, Sony/BMG, Warner, etc.) reportedly have
> the concert participation clause now, on most of their new, up and
> coming brazilian artists (the bigger names are still escaping this).
> Have in mind that our national artists are 90% or more of our charts and
> sales, and that ours is one of the bigger music markets in the world
> (not sure as of now, but somewhere among the top 8-15). I found this
> incredible, even having in mind that there is no proof or affirmation of
> the clause being actually executed, but no label representative denied
> it clearly. It seems very likely and true that the clause is there.
>
> Rafael.
>


Message Index for 2006042, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help