Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2006041, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "floatingunder" <Steven.Durben@cignabehavioral.com>
Subject Re: The Early Who By A Landslide
Date Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:23:51 -0000

[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (2.4 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

--- In audities@yahoogroups.com, rob@... wrote:
The R&R Circus performance has the advantage of familiarity, as we've 
all
watched and been amazed by it hundreds of times. Even the inferior, 
abridged and
sped up VCR version of it is spectacular, never mind the full-blown, 
cleaned up
DVD version.

Still, Daltrey is less than a 25%-er- I'll take a howling, mic-
twirling,
confident, post-Tommy Roger with Pete prowling and leaping throughout 
stage left
any day. They're truly operating on four cylinders.


Hi Rob,
 It's interesting to me, that you say that, per what I have been 
mulling over in my head during this discussion on The Who.
  I love the early Who era quite a lot more then mid-period era you 
and other's think is them at their best (different stokes).  But why 
then is it that when I picture The Who in my mind, I see the mic-
twirling Daltrey era Who, not the version I like more?  I think, to 
state the obvious, it's in part the one I saw live per my age (and 
did love seeing them live too, by the way). But, also I had been 
thinking, it's the version of them that I've seen many times more 
via "The Kid's are Alright" and other clips of The Who in various 
films. So, honestly, I feel like I've been exposed to this version of 
The Who much, much more then the early incarnation. 
    I'm not sure how to equate which version was better live in my 
own mind (early vs. mid-period Who). Townshend continued to get 
bigger and more dramatic and it's hard not to be in awe of that. 
Daltrey's more confident, mic-tossing stage antics kind of grow 
tiresome to me (again, just my little opinion).  But for me, some of 
the big live hit songs from the 70's "Won't get fooled again" 
or "Long live Rock" and so on, were fun live but they just are not 
songs I would actually sit down an listen to (really not so much then 
and less so now). Where as I can listen to anything of the singles 
and many other songs from the 60's Who. Just my personal take. Again, 
there are many songs in the 70's that I think are great by them but 
some of the major hits started feeling a bit bloated to listen to for 
what I'm looking for. But, again, it's just whatever floats your 
boat.  I know that there are people on this list that are passionate 
about The Who (I'm guessing some more so then I am… different degrees 
of passion, perhaps ) and I'm not trying to tarnish or dismiss what 
anyone else's truth is about the band. 

Steve D








Message Index for 2006041, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help