smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Eytan Mirsky" <eytanmirsky@hotmail.com> |
| Subject | Bad review writing (was The Supahip) |
| Date | Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:22:21 -0500 |
[Part 1 text/plain (0.7 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
John L. Micek (re the Supahip_:
>... reviewed in PopMatters.com today:
>
>http://www.popmatters.com/music/reviews/s/supahip-seize.shtml
>
This review says about the collaboration of the two bandmembers:
In the end the whole process wound up enervating the songwriters -- both of
whom were more or less used to being the sole songwriter on their respective
projects -- and infused the songs with a simplified vitality and immediacy
that the pair felt tied them back to "the good old days" or early rock
music.
Really? It enervated them? Meaning it sapped the strength from them? It
weakened them? I'm assuming the dude meant that it energized them. Buy a
dictionary or thesaurus, please.
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.