Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2006013, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Christopher" <plattc@optonline.net>
Subject Re: Coulda Been a Power Pop Contendah
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:34:21 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (0.8 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Jim sez:

> What non-power pop band could have, with some editing; different
> production; and where applicable, reduced sex appeal, made a great power
> pop band?
> 
> My first nomination may be too obvious, because in my mind they
> practically were one in all but marketing and lyrical content: Van Halen
> (DLR edition).
> 
> I'll also go out on a limb and suggest that, with a sturdy razor blade and
> a device for evening out odd time signatures, Yes could have been turned
> into a very cool power pop band.

While you're out on that limb, I'd add the Fripp/Belew/Levin/Bruford era
King Crimson ('81-'84).  Excise some of the instrumental tracks, and a good
bit of what's left is pretty darn power-poppy.

Christopher




Message Index for 2006013, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help