Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2006013, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "John L. Micek" <jlmicek@comcast.net>
Subject Re: Bad review writing (was The Supahip)
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:12:29 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Yeouch.
Kids -- to neutral corners, please.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Cagle" <gregc@gregcagle.com>
To: "Stewart Mason" <craigtorso@verizon.net>
Cc: <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: Bad review writing (was The Supahip)


> Stewart Mason said the following on 1/17/2006 7:12 PM:
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eytan Mirsky" 
>> <eytanmirsky@hotmail.com>
>>> Really? It enervated them? Meaning it sapped the strength from them? It 
>>> weakened them?  I'm assuming the dude meant that it energized them. Buy 
>>> a dictionary or thesaurus, please.
>>>
>> A thesaurus is particularly useful when reviewing one of Eytan Mirsky's 
>> records.  Most editors will only let you use the phrase "talentless hack" 
>> once per paragraph, so it's useful to have synonyms at hand.
>
> Ouch. That's gonna leave a mark.
>
> -- 
> Greg Cagle
> gregc at gregcagle dot com
> 



Message Index for 2006013, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help