smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Career Records <eldeluxe@mcn.net> |
| Subject | Re: audities-digest V4 #18 (13 msgs) |
| Date | Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:30:34 -0700 |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.7 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
I don't know about "underrated". Not around here anyway. When I saw the Choch Watchband on the bill with Love, they opened with All Sold Out. Buttons had just come out
that day...
It is a very "British" album compared to Aftermath. Not too surprising that Jagger doesn't rate it very high. I think some of his problem is on the technical side. Too
many sub mixes killed the sound... I dunno, it's got a great weird sound to it.
I recently picked up another mono copy. I was surprised to find that my original (still got the shrink wrap and the "buttons" sticker) sounded fantastic.
Glad the last batch of reissues gave you the UK running order. It was a shame that when the Stones finally started making dedicated albums, rather than collections of
songs, they got hacked up to include US singles.
RS
emasley@Post-Gazette.com wrote:
> I also always thought "Between the Buttons" sounded like the Kinks. And I can't think of any other Stones album that made me think that. Awesome, underrated classic.
>
> Ed
> NP: Trogglodynamite
>
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:53:31 -0800
> From: Marty Rudnick <mrudnick@marturo.com>
> To: audities@smoe.org
> Subject: Between The Buttons
> Message-ID: <43C2DB5B.9000102@marturo.com>
>
> Completely out of nowhere, I wanted to pop in and say that Between The
> Buttons is my favorite Rolling Stones album. It's one of those albums
> that really needs to be heard uninterrupted, from beginning to end. I
> think it's a close as they ever came to a pop album. At times, it kind
> of seems more like a Kinks album.
>
> That is all...
>
> Marty
-- Ronald Sanchez
Director Of A&R
Career Records
www.CareerRecords.com
The new Donovan's Brain Site
www.Donovans-Brain.net
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.