smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Jim Lines" <ricky@jameslines.freeserve.co.uk> |
| Subject | Re: Supergrass; was Power Pop on Sound Opinions |
| Date | Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:21:24 +0100 |
[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (2.4 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
I think the title is a concession to the band's commercial decline. But
that's just my interpretation!
Jim
www.myspace.com/thebandcalledricky
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Good" <javagene@hotmail.com>
To: <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Supergrass; was Power Pop on Sound Opinions
> Jim,
> Just so you know ,I am very high on the review .That is why I quoted
it.I
> love Pat's reviews, and consider Mojo a great source.My editorial comment
> only came about as I typed the quote and heard fellow members saying "Oh
> C'mon".I really consider Pat's "20 year" theory to be quite possible.
> I actually read the review on a plane ride to San Francisco.And it has
> stuck with me.I went back and read the whole review again ,I enjoyed it so
> much.And maybe you can help me here.When he refers to the album's title,
> "Road to Rouen" he says "get it?"I don't.What am I missing?
> .
>
>
> >From: Jim Lines <ricky@jameslines.freeserve.co.uk>
> >Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
> >To: audities@smoe.org
> >Subject: Re: Supergrass; was Power Pop on Sound Opinions
> >Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:24:45 +0200 (CEST)
> >
> >Pat Gilbert is a very good friend of mine and I can assure you that these
> >words were not tongue-in-cheek.
> >By the way, any fans of The Clash should check out Pat's biography of the
> >band. Pat is good friends with Mick Jones and many members of the band's
> >entourage. It's a superb read.
> >
> >Jim Lines
> >www.myspace.com/thebandcalledricky
> >========================================
> >Message Received: Sep 13 2005, 08:20 PM
> >From: "Gene Good"
> >To: audities@smoe.org
> >Cc:
> >Subject: Re: Supergrass; was Power Pop on Sound Opinions
> >
> >Not to counter anything you just wrote , because I haven't heard it yet,
> >but
> >the Mojo review really praises it.Only 4 stars, in adverse to their
coveted
> >5,but it is what is written that interests.The reviewer, Pat
Gilbert,claims
> >that in 20 years two names will come up when discussing the "really cool
> >bands" of this era." the two names that'll come up are, I'll wager,
> >Supergrass and Super Furry Animals.From the mists of time,their music
will
> >appear more original and weird and pertinent to their era than any
other."
> >Could be British tongue in cheek.But he does go on to praise the album as
a
> >"real grower".Michael's comment made me think of this.
> >
> >Gene
> >
> >
> > >://
>
>
>
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.