Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2005081, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Larry O Dean" <larryodean@poetrycenter.org>
Subject Re: Big Star in Rolling Stone
Date Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:13:26 -0600

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (0.7 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Actually, I prefer the erratic Chilton oeuvre over this. There are a few 
good moments, but also just as many (or more) songs that sound like filler. 

They're accurate when they say don't expect anything like the previous 
albums. I think they were having fun but it doesn't wield much weight even 
divorced from the Big Star pedigree and myth. 

Michael Bennett writes: 

> The article gives me the impression that this Big Star
> album will be similar to the generally spotty output
> of Alex Chilton.   
> 
> Mike Bennett 
> 
> --- Larry O Dean <larryodean@poetrycenter.org> wrote: 
> 
>> http://tinyurl.com/7727b
 


Message Index for 2005081, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help