Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2005062, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Jim Kosmicki" <jkosmicki@cccneb.edu>
Subject Emusic additions
Date Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:43:21 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

eMusic has just recently added the new Ringo Starr and Teenage Fanclub
discs (for those who say they have trouble finding their quota each
month!!).

They also have the new Aquabats, which I just pre-ordered on disc, so
the days of eMusic releases being "quarantined" for a while after the
physical release seem to be dissolving, at least for some labels.

With the recent discussion of russian bootleg sites and eMusic, and with
eMusic's shift away from their unlimited download policy, I would like
to repeat a question I've asked before.  I know we have musicians and
label-chiefs on this list who distribute via eMusic. How do the royalty
rates from eMusic stack up? Before it was on an ASCAP, distribute based
on popularity mode, but I'd hope with the new model that it's more based
on actual "sales."  

Is legitimate downloading becoming a recognizable, or even significant,
source of royalty income for artists?  


Message Index for 2005062, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help