smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | rob@splitsville.com |
| Subject | =?US-ASCII?B?UkU6IE15IGZhdm9yaXRlIGJhbmQgY2FuIGJlYXQgdXAgeW91ciBmYXZvcml0ZSBiYW5k?= |
| Date | Fri, 13 May 2005 15:01:30 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.1 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Nah, I don't think anyone on this board (least of all me) sees extolling the Stones as a putdown of other bands. I'm sure most people here love all of 'em for various reasons, at various times to varying degrees.
Rob
www.splitsville.com
>----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
>From: :audities@smoe.org
>To: audities@smoe.org
>Sent: Fri, 13 May 2005 10:23:15
>
>I don't understand why a thread about the Stones
>has to lead to a bunch of
>"What about the ... ?" posts. Honestly, I don't see
>how extolling the merits
>(or lack thereof) of the Stones constitutes a
>putdown of the Kinks or the
>Who.
>
>For the record, I love all three bands. I love the
>Beatles, too. I don't see
>anything mutually exclusive about their fan bases.
>Talking about the Stones
>no more implicitly insults the Kinks or the Who
>than talking about Silver
>Sun implicitly insults Admiral Twin or the Shazam.
>
>As my dear mother used to say to us boys when we
>were in the midst of yet
>another bout of sibling warfare, "You're all
>different, but I love you all
>the same."
>
>
>Gregory Sager
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.