Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2005052, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Stewart Mason" <craigtorso@verizon.net>
Subject Re: The Kinks
Date Fri, 13 May 2005 01:47:42 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lee Elliott" <pop@anotherplanet.ca>
> > Boo hoo wah.  Number one, fucking brilliant set of commercials,
> one of the best marriages of music and images I've ever seen in 
> advertising.
>
> Paying for the right to associate your product with something that's 
> already cool is not brilliant or original.
>
Have you actually seen the ads in question?  Your comment assumes that 
the music itself is the best part, which couldn't be further from the 
truth.  I'm talking here about the cinematography and the editing. 
Which are brilliant.  Which are original.  (The cinematography in 
particular; I'm sure that a few years from now, the effect might seem 
amateurish, but right now, this is pretty damned impressive.)  They 
could set these ads to an oompah band playing "My Old Kentucky Home," 
and if the images were still as perfectly cut to the beat of the music 
as they are now, the ads would still be effective.

S


Message Index for 2005052, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help