Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2005042, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From jchasin@nyc.rr.com
Subject Re: The Art of Mixing
Date Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:13:07 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (3.9 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Rob:

Interesting post.  If you prefer Exile (as I do), I'm curious what you mean by "train wreck;" this would seem to imply something bad.  Although often woords like "sloppy" seem to have a negative connotation, but are in fact used in a flattering way in describing some music.

When some Girls came out, it was "new Stones;" whereas Exile was the classic stuff.  Hard to believe Some Girls is now 27 years old (to put that in context, 27 years BEFORE Some Girls was 1951...)





 
----- Original Message -----
From: rob@splitsville.com
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:53 pm
Subject: RE: The Art of Mixing

> Probably the best pair of albums by one artist to contrast the 
> 'music vs. vocals' styles is the Stones 'Exile On Main Street' vs. 
> 'Some Girls'. 
> 
> Jimmy Miller's production on Exile had Keith and Mick Taylor's 
> guitars up front, with Mick's vocals buried in the mix. This is 
> hardly surprising, as these tracks were recorded at Keith's home 
> in France, and he was the biggest 'driver' of these recordings. 
> And yes, Miguel, this album is, for the most part, an absolute 
> freight train.
> 
> Mick's vocals are high in the mix in Some Girls and he's easier to 
> understand, because, he claimed, he 'simply liked the lyrics 
> better'. The more probable reason is the fact that while the 
> production is credited to the Glimmer Twins, Keith was coming off 
> the Toronto bust and Mick was more fully asserting his leadership 
> of the band.
> 
> As for a preference, I prefer the former.
> Rob
> www.splitsville.com 
> 
> >----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
> >From: "Miguel Motta" <motta_m@firn.edu>
> >To: <audities@smoe.org>
> >Sent: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:04:54
> >
> >In my personal pursuit to become a better recording
> >engineer especially in the area of mixing the final
> >tracks I've had some thoughts... 
> >
> >Lately I've been listening to music, actually have
> >been "studying" the music I listen to attempting to
> >grasp a better understanding of how "the masters"
> >mix their music (this includes lots of indies'
> >recordings)... In my case my main musical influence
> >goes back to, you guessed it, The Beatles...
> >
> >Upon carefully listening to The Fabs' mixes (read
> >as George Martin's) I find that a lot of them were
> >"in-your-face" bold upfront instruments especially
> >during the first four or five albums (perhaps they
> >set instrumentation back around the Rubber Soul
> >period...and even then the instruments played a
> >major role in the mix)... I hear a lot of groups
> >that tend to lay back (compress) their instruments
> >allowing more headroom to the vocals... On the
> >other hand I've listened to mixes in which the
> >vocals are hardly audible due to the instruments
> >dominating the spectrum...
> >
> >After this long-winded preface I guess my question
> >to anyone interested is what type of mix turn you
> >on the most?  I know this can vary from song to
> >song but I'm trying to figure out what was
> >partially responsbible for The Beatles' success as
> >recording artists (we know that it was due to a big
> >number of factors) but speaking about the mix does
> >anyone think that it was due to that "in-your-face"
> >instrumentation approach that I perceive?  When you
> >listen to songs like "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" and
> >"She Loves You", man the sound was like a freight
> >train just rolling over you... and I honestly don't
> >think (correct me if I'm wrong) that there has
> >hardly been another band since that has tried that
> >approach again (arguable of course becaue grunge
> >rock could be classified as "in-your-face" upfront
> >music)... 
> >
> >Ok so after all this I still don't know what I mean
> >to say... hopefully someone out there might... In
> >any case I got this off my chest...lol
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Miguel
> >
> >Meet "The Michaels" @
> >www.myspace.com/themichaels 
> 


Message Index for 2005042, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help