Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2005042, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Ken Kase <kenkase@nighttimes.com>
Subject Re: The Art of Mixing
Date Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:12:37 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)




On 4/14/05 12:59 AM, "Tiny Volcano" <tinyvolcano@wavecable.com> wrote:

> Also, I recall the Beatles were the first band (?) to really push the bass
> upfront --which was another bold mixing strategy. (See the Abbey Road
> Journals)


Remember that the Beatles were trying to emulate American R&B records with
that bass sound. Motown and Stax records were already loaded with bass. In
1966, EMI came up with new cutting lathe technology that allowed for more
bass content. So they weren't the first, but they certainly raised the
presence of bass in rock and roll recordings considerably.

As for compression, from 1966 onward, they used loads of it--that's why
Ringo's drums suddenly became huge. I can't imagine ""Paperback Writer", "A
Day in the Life" or "She Said, She Said" without loads of compression. Abbey
Road's reverb chamber was used spaingly but effectively, hence the worm
wonderful sound on "And I Love Her" (especially the stereo version.

--Ken



Message Index for 2005042, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help