Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2005013, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Bryan" <munki100@pacbell.net>
Subject Re: Elton used to have it
Date Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:10:13 -0800

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (0.9 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Billy G. Spradlin wrote:
> MCA was forcing him to crank out 2-3 albums a year between 70-76 and the
> well of great Taupin/John songs simply ran out. The endless touring,
workpace and drug abuse didnt help.

Billy, are you guessing that's what happened....? 2-3 albums
per year? Or did MCA actually stipulate that in his recording
contract? I've never read or heard that, but I'm not the world's
biggest Elton John fan either -- I just find it hard to swallow
that the record company would push for that much new stuff
in that period of time.

I went online and did a little research (and whether it's wrong
or right, who knows?), and read he re-signed with MCA on
or around July 19, 1974 for a five album deal worth $8 million
(it was the most lucrative recording contract in rock history
at the time). I find it a little hard to believe it was for 2-3 albums
per year, that's all.

Bryan


Message Index for 2005013, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help