Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2005013, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "bob" <segarini@rogers.com>
Subject Re: Paul McCartney
Date Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:32:56 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (2.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Mr. Lefsetz is also a lawyer. His passion for music, and his understanding 
of what's happened to The Major Labels, Radio, and the listeners is spot on. 
He writes passionately and personally about these things, and speaks all 
over the world in the hopes of educating the people responsible for the 
demise of the old template, to embrace the new.
Google him...he's an interesting guy...and more right than wrong.

bob



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill" <billm45s@verizon.net>
To: <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Paul McCartney


>
>>
>> From: Michael Bennett <mrhonorama@ameritech.net>
>> Date: 2005/01/20 Thu PM 04:20:58 GMT
>> To: audities@smoe.org
>> Subject: Re: Paul McCartney
>>
>> This piece might be more meaningful if Mr. Lefsetz
>> knew how to write.  This could be edited down to about
>> a paragraph or two, and make the same points much more
>> effectively.
>>
>
> Michael, as one attorney to another (who are cursed to read a certain type 
> of writing), you are of course correct - it could have been edited to a 
> couple of simple bullet points.  But, that wasn't the whole point.  Such 
> editing might make the rational arguement  easier to digest.  However, the 
> rational arguement is secondary to the emotive and I think he makes that 
> arguement quite well, as he trys to portray the emotional reaction within 
> a context of the time.  Sure it is scattered and never quite direct, but 
> as someone who was around at the time, it had the ring of truth and I was 
> glad Bob posted it.
>
> "Band on the Run" was the post Beatles statement.  And at the time you 
> said damn McCartney really did it, which was a suprise because Lefsetz was 
> right, his prior solo albums were "slight".  The sad part is that "Band on 
> the Run" proved he could do it, but overall despite all the subsequent 
> great tracks and even enjoyable albums, he went backwards towards 
> "slight".    Lefsetz's writing, to me, captured that sense better than the 
> straight rational arguement.
>
> Bill
>
>
> 


Message Index for 2005013, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help