Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2005011, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Michael Bennett <mrhonorama@ameritech.net>
Subject Re: Excu-u-u-se Meeee! (and Nellie McKay and Stamey V.O.T.E.)
Date Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:49:13 -0800 (PST)

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (2.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Three for the price of one --

1.  Audities is devoted to insanely great pop -- not
just power pop.  As for the poll -- it's poll of
Auditeers to find out what their favorite albums were
in a given year, with no restrictions as to genre. 
That's what's so fun about seeing the lists -- some
folks here are 100% pop to the core, others have very
diverse interests.

2.  Response to Ken Kase -- my comment about Nellie
McKay in comparison to Lee, Shore and London (the
singers, not the law firm) was as a vocalist, not as a
songwriter.  However, you may want to double check
your facts -- Peggy Lee did a little songwriting in
her time.

3.  Respone to Stewart -- A very clever tactic to
reserve your write to vote for the album formerly
known as V.O.T.E. for the 2005 poll.  As it is, I
voted for V.O.T.E. this year -- and couldn't squeeze
Travels In The South on my final 20, though it came
very close.  It is so great to have Stamey back --
while I think the reconfiguration of the V.O.T.E.
album is silly, I hope that the 2005 release may lead
to some live dates around the U.S. of A.

Mike Bennett
--- jim@groovedisques.com wrote:

> Without going back into the archives from previous
> Januaries, it sure seems like there have been more
> apologies than ever regarding people's inclusion of
> records that are "not exactly power pop" on their
> year-end list. Please tell me if I'm wrong, but
> although it's clear this list is rooted in our love
> for power pop, can't music appreciation run a little
> deeper or wider than that? Hell, there are plenty of
> '60s bands we all profess to love who did not churn
> out "exactly power pop" with each release. I say
> bring on your best of lists without apologies! This
> old fart needs to have as many options to consider
> catching up on as possible. Thanks.
> 
> Jim
> www.groovedisques.com
> 
> 


=====
Chicago Pop Show Report on Yahoo Groups: http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/chicagopopshowreport/?yguid=162827291

Music reviews:  http://www.fufkin.com

Message Index for 2005011, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help