smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Mike <paris2000@comcast.net> |
| Subject | Re: Beatles reissues? |
| Date | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:13:29 -0800 |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.2 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
It's really hard to understand why Apple is doing such a lousy job on
packaging. Beatles 1 was decent enough but I was highly underwhelmed by
Let It Be Naked. It makes one wonder who's art directing over there and
who did they know that got them that job???
- Mike
On Wednesday, November 17, 2004, at 11:13 PM, Billy G. Spradlin wrote:
> Ok I guess we cant blame the Tower then.
>
> After the outstanding-to-good jobs Beatles.inc have done with other
> reissue
> projects, I'm disapointed in a rush job and the cheap packaging - its
> still
> not
> worth $60 full price. (bought mine for $44.99) I have bought box sets
> that
> cost
> much much less with 4 CD's in jewel cases and a large booklet.
>
> (Bitch, Bitch, Bitch)
> Billy
>
> At 02:04 PM 11/17/2004 -0800, you wrote:
>> Regarding the packaging. I spoke directly with Bruce Spizer who was a
>> consultant for this project and he told me Apple in England was
>> responsible for the packaging and Capitol was responsible for the
>> remastering using their tapes. I'm just passing along info.
>>
>> - Mike
>
> Billy G. Spradlin
> http://listen.to/jangleradio
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.