Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004111, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Michael Bennett <mrhonorama@ameritech.net>
Subject Re: Drunk poetry
Date Mon, 1 Nov 2004 16:18:39 -0800 (PST)

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Between Stewart and Ronald, I stand corrected.  This
is definitely a gap in my knowledge, but this explains
a lot.  Thanks for the info.

Mike Bennett
--- Stewart Mason <craigtorso@verizon.net> wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@ameritech.net>
> To: <audities@smoe.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Drunk poetry
> 
> 
> > I've never really explored The Doors, but I do
> like
> > some of their material.  Wasn't Love supposed to
> be
> > the next Doors -- there is some common ground
> there.
> 
> You've got it exactly backwards: Morrison said that
> his goal for the 
> Doors was to be "as big as Love," and Love's first
> two albums predated 
> the Doors by some distance.  The first Love album
> came out in 1965, DA 
> CAPO in 1966.
> 
> As a young teenybopper, my wife saw the Doors,
> twice, both times late 
> in the fat drunken idiot's decline.  She says they
> were utterly 
> pathetic.
> 
> S
> 
> 
> 


=====
Chicago Pop Show Report on Yahoo Groups: http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/chicagopopshowreport/?yguid=162827291

Music reviews:  http://www.fufkin.com

Message Index for 2004111, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help