smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | Michael Bennett <mrhonorama@ameritech.net> |
Subject | Re: Drunk poetry |
Date | Mon, 1 Nov 2004 16:18:39 -0800 (PST) |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.2 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Between Stewart and Ronald, I stand corrected. This
is definitely a gap in my knowledge, but this explains
a lot. Thanks for the info.
Mike Bennett
--- Stewart Mason <craigtorso@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@ameritech.net>
> To: <audities@smoe.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Drunk poetry
>
>
> > I've never really explored The Doors, but I do
> like
> > some of their material. Wasn't Love supposed to
> be
> > the next Doors -- there is some common ground
> there.
>
> You've got it exactly backwards: Morrison said that
> his goal for the
> Doors was to be "as big as Love," and Love's first
> two albums predated
> the Doors by some distance. The first Love album
> came out in 1965, DA
> CAPO in 1966.
>
> As a young teenybopper, my wife saw the Doors,
> twice, both times late
> in the fat drunken idiot's decline. She says they
> were utterly
> pathetic.
>
> S
>
>
>
=====
Chicago Pop Show Report on Yahoo Groups: http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/chicagopopshowreport/?yguid=162827291
Music reviews: http://www.fufkin.com
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.