Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004111, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Richard Brown <rbrown1985@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: UK R&R Hall of Fame
Date Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:34:53 -0800 (PST)

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (2.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

I cannot believe that The Hollies get ignored....even
in the UK! They were number 2 only to The Beatles as a
singles act in the 1960's, and a great band to boot...

U2 and Madonna get an automatic entry, but not The
Rolling Stones? Please!!!

On the plus side...it's good to see The Kinks get
their props....

Rich B

> 
> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:31:22 +0000
> From: bob_hutton@standardlife.com
> To: audities@smoe.org
> Subject: UK R&R Hall of Fame
> Message-ID:
>
<OF249966FE.01B9D2F3-ON80256F3F.004E3448-80256F3F.004FCF63@standardlife.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dunno if any of you guys have caught this show on UK
> Channel 4 at all.
> Each week, they pick a decade (working in reverse
> from 90's to 50's) and
> document 10 acts which a "top panel" has decided
> will be the nominees who
> deserve entry to the Hall of Fame.  The viewers have
> to vote (on a premium
> rate phone-line, natch) to choose which one of the
> 10 goes in.
> 
> Last night was the turn of the 60's.  So we had:
> 
>    James Brown
>    Simon and Garfunkel
>    Beach Boys
>    Aretha Franklin
>    Velvet Underground
>    Bob Dylan
>    Rolling Stones
>    Kinks
>    Supremes
>    Jimi Hendrix
> 
> 
> What the F*&%?!?  No Byrds?  No Doors?  No Who?
> 
> Now I will concede that Aretha Franklin has a great
> voice (although I
> absolutely DETEST that gospel-style singing - over
> emotive, melodramatic
> clap-trap) but was she really all that popular or
> influential?
> 
> Velvet Underground WERE influential, but were they
> actually any good?  I
> always thought it a lot of it was style-over-content
> with them.  (Similary
> Joy Division who were nominated as one of the 80's
> Acts a few weeks ago)
> 
> Do Simon and Garfunkel really deserve to be in there
> with JB, The Stones,
> Beach Boys and Hendrix?
> 
> Feel free to discuss .....
> 
> B^)
> 
> PS In case you are wondering why an obvious name is
> missing from the above
> list, 5 acts get automatically shoed in:  The
> Beatles, U2, Elvis Presley,
> Bob Marley and Madonna - I'm sure the Beatles and
> Elvis are charmed to be
> in such exalted company!
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 


Message Index for 2004111, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help