smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Richard Gagnon <gasp@aga.ca> |
| Subject | Elvis : that's the way it is |
| Date | Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:25:41 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.5 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Jake wrote:
> Okay. But am I wrong in thinking, as I thought most of the naturalized
> world did, that the point of Elvis was he brought R&B (and yes,
> country and his awful showtune renditions) ALL to the white populace?
Well, what I was thinking of, when I said show tunes, was his
wonderfully lugubrious version of "Blue Moon". What a brilliant deep
down dirge. Between his and the Marcels' version, there's worlds of
distance, and still they both blow me away. The performance and the
concept behind it make all the difference, especially with a first-rate
song to build upon.
> BLUES for chrissakes, which was originally (oh god) a BLACK man's
> music and whites didn't want to hear it from some black guy but they'd
> hear it from a greaser-trucker who had no prior music experience but
> loved his mama?
It's not so much a point of bringing all these genres to the masses
individually that made it work, it's the effortless melding of these
roots, often within a single song, that brought him notice. Elvis
didn't think "black music", "white music". He just thought "I likes it,
uh uh". Basically. ;)
> Definitely a performer. But a stupid actor. Even
> though I love those movies.
>
Even then, "those movies" are not all created equal. Elvis started out
very promisingly as an actor. King Creole, Flaming Star, Jailhouse
Rock, Wild in the Country...but unfortunately there's almost 30 more...
> Everything is out there for a reason.
>
For better or for worse. Very true.
Rick
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.