Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004103, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Ken Kase <kenkase@nighttimes.com>
Subject Re: Capitol Albums
Date Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:28:14 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (1.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Yeah, "Let it Be...Naked" was a drag. A low point in Beatles reissue
history--I happened to write a review of that when it came out and I was
less than kind:

http://www.nighttimes.com/nt_main.asp?aID=446



On 10/14/04 1:26 PM, "Billy G. Spradlin" <bgspradlin@cablelynx.com> wrote:

> I guess Im on the other side of the fence where I feel that some classic
> recordings that already sound great need to be left alone. Many new remixes
> have left me down, wishing I was in the studio smacking whoever was mixing it
> with a Nerf bat when it didnt sound "right". (leave that Digital Delay OFF, Mr
> Talmy!)
> 
> And it upsets me a younger generation will hear these remixes first, and
> ignore
> the mono versions. I grew up on FM Oldies radio in the 70's and heard
> (memorized) most 50's-60's classic oldies in stereo. When I started collecting
> the original mono singles and LP's in the 80's and 90's it was shocking to
> hear
> that many mono mixes were drastically better than the stereo.
> 
> I just hope we dont get any more "Let It Be...Naked" where everything is fed
> through Pro Tools and "fixed".
> 
> Billy
>   
> Billy G. Spradlin
> http://listen.to/jangleradio



Message Index for 2004103, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help