Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004102, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Robert Sutliff" <rsutliff@columbus.rr.com>
Subject Re: Capitol Albums
Date Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:35:57 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (2.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

I suspect that redoing the Beatles catalog is already a work in progress. As
many of you know, up until The White Album, they recorded on 4 track tape
machines. When they filled up the 4 tracks a reduction mixdown to another 4
track deck was done so more tracks could be added. The technology now exists
to lock up the original 4 tracks with the additional tracks, thus enabling a
much cleaner mix (less inherent tape noise) and also bad stereo imaging
decisions could be corrected. The recent Yellow Submarine disc used this
process. Still, I dig (mostly) the original mixes. And really, it's the
songs that count. And they are among the best pop songs ever.

I still play my Parlophone lps and they sound great (especially the mono
ones). I can't imagine wanting to listen to a reissue of the wretched US
versions.

Bobby Sutliff

>
> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:36:00 +0100
> From: bob_hutton@standardlife.com
> To: audities@smoe.org
> Subject: Re: Capitol Albums
> Message-ID:
<OF37A96916.4B7F3744-ON80256F2D.002E0542-80256F2D.002F73B6@standardlife.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks to Chris Coyle for all the interesting info. on the Beatles US
> mixes.  Fascinating.  I'll prob. end up buying this set.
>
> However, what the Beatles catalogue really needs is for someone to dive in
> and create fresh modern stereo mixes of as much of their material as
> possible (like the work done on Yellow Submarine songtrack) and ALSO to
> remaster them using up to date technology.  I have all the CD versions of
> their albums and I find the sound on some of them incredibly thin and
weedy
> (Please Please Me, Beatles for Sale, Revolver).
>
> I had the Beach Boys 2-fers when they came out back around 1990, and
> happened to pick up (cheaply) the remastered new (circa 2000) version of
> Today/Summer Days.  The newer one  blows the earlier CD away TOTALLY in
> respect of audio quality.  The Beatles back catalogue deserves to be kept
> up to date sonically in the same way.
>
> So, Apple, Parlophone, whatever ..... how about new versions of all the
> Beatles albums, each containing remastered modern "true" stereo mixes PLUS
> the original mono mixes (over which George Martin took so much care).  Now
> that would be something worth waiting for.
>
>
> Bob



Message Index for 2004102, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help