smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Jeff" <Jeffrey@dol.net> |
| Subject | Re: Raspberries thread |
| Date | Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:30:59 -0400 |
[Part 1 text/plain Windows-1252 (1.6 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
> In a message dated 10/4/04 8:01:44 PM Central Daylight Time,
audities-owner@smoe.org writes:
> Lastly, and with all due respect to ALL of you guys: this Raspberries
line-up thread became TEDIOUS sometime *last* week. Geez! I mean, I know
they're part of the holy trinity, and I'm as big a fan as the next guy,
but ... c'mon! It's kinda like posting about guitars and high end
recording gear when you start bickering over lineup changes that mean
NOTHING to 98% of us. Okay? Again, no disrespect, just a different
perspective. Passion is great, beating a dead horse is just silly (and
cruel).
> Jeff T.
Delaware
>Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 21:23:48 EDT
From: Donmand@aol.com
To: audities@smoe.org
Subject: Re: Raspberries thread
Message-ID: <6b.352371c6.2e9351a4@aol.com>
>Jeff:
If you don't like the Raspberries Reunion thread? Do what I do with
about 50%
of the topics that are 'beat to death" every week on the Audities board.
Scroll right on by them. It's a big World of Music. I try not to follow
every
subject either.
Don
> PS: Don't take it personally.
_________________________________________
Not at all, Don, thanks. I don't usually post gripes about threads I'm
not interested in. This one just kind of amazed me in that it SEEMINGLY
involved only a half-handful of guys and the subject matter was SO
specific about something that seems to mean so very little to so many of
us. Perhaps I'm more than a bit uneducated when it comes to Raspberries
personnel and their contributions, and the overall effect those changes
had on the recorded output. I'll do more homework and less bitchin'
<grin>.
Jeff T.
De.
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.