Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004094, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Robert Sutliff" <rsutliff@columbus.rr.com>
Subject Re: Brian Wilson Smiles
Date Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:33:15 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (3.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

David,

We're pals and all that but I respectfully and completely disagree with you
on this. I stood outside of my local Borders this morning until they opened
and bought the new Smile. Quite frankly I'm floored how well Brian sings on
it. I think the singing on Wonderful is a trifle weak but otherwise I think
it's terrific.

Yes I know he doesn't have the amazing range he did in 1966 but hell - who
does? McCartney has trouble hitting the high notes now and lets not even
mention Robert Plant.

Anyway, I think this is easily the best disc I've bought in years. And I'm
very, very familiar with the original versions having owned a myriad of
bootlegs for decades now.

I wonder how long it will take Mike Love to sue him for his lack of
songwriting credit on Good Vibrations? I know the version used is earlier
with different lyrics but I'm sure that won't stop Mr. Love.

Bobby Sutliff
Columnated ruins domino indeed

>
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:59:16 -0700
> From: "David Bash" <bashpop@earthlink.net>
> To: "Audities" <audities@smoe.org>
> Subject: Re: Brian Wilson Smiles on the Tonight show
> Message-ID: <003401c4a50f$86178f80$5116fea9@david>
>
> I too feel very fortunate to have been there, and like Brian and Bryan I
> thought the show was absolutely incredible.  I had been listening to the
> album all weekend, and the extravaganza took the majesty of the music to a
> whole new level.
>
> Having said that, and I know I am going to be in a very small minority
here,
> no matter how many times I hear the album or think about the show, I keep
> coming back to the same thing: there is one huge blemish on everything
(and
> I hate myself for even suggesting it), and that is Brian's voice.
>
> Yes, of course I realize it's completely understandable that, after years
of
> drug and cigarette abuse, coupled with the fact that the man is 62 years
> old, his vocal prowess will have diminished.  I realize that it's a
miracle
> that Brian has come as far as he has, and that he's out there touring, let
> alone having as much fun as he is.  I am profoundly proud of Brian for the
> strides he has made, and that he was able to get it together to such a
> degree that he was able to finish Smile, an album that nobody thought
would
> ever see the light of day.  None of this changes the fact that putting his
> lead vocals on top of that magnificent music is like painting a moustache
on
> the Mona Lisa.
>
> Yeah, I know he provided lead vocals on his previous three albums, and if
> anyone read my reviews of those albums they know that I didn't offer the
> same criticism.  All I can say is that, somehow with Smile, it's
different.
> Maybe I can't help but think of what could have been, and with the actual
> vintage recordings around on several bootlegs to frame my perceptions, it
> just further brings home the point with me.
>
> I am not trying to suggest that Brian doesn't have the right to sing lead
on
> his creation; of course he does.  However, I know how much better it would
> sound with someone like Jeffrey Foskett doing the leads, and I think
vocals
> of that caliber would have been much more appropriate.
>
> Ok, I feel dirty now.  Go ahead, hang me in effigy.
>
> David



Message Index for 2004094, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help