Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004081, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From erhoek@comcast.net
Subject Re: Beates? Yeah, yeah, yeah...
Date Wed, 04 Aug 2004 05:08:52 +0000

[Part 1 text/plain (4.6 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Mildred and Patty Hill
Done without a Goolge search but I do read movie credits constantly and it is in about 1 of every 8 movies or so.

-r
Np..v/a -Second Thoughts

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> At Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:49:40 Barry wrote: 
> 
> >Gee Jaimie, you have such great things to say . . . usually. These 
> >however make no sense to me at all. 
> > 
> > > 1) It was Pink Floyd's "Dark Side Of The Moon" that was sent up in the 
> > > Voyager explorer to the other side of the galaxy....NOT the Beatles. 
> >It's 
> > > all about frame of reference. 
> > 
> >So, a couple of dude at NASA liked the irony of that selection, or maybe 
> >they actually liked the record. That says zero about history. 
> 
> But it perfectly discredits Josh's assertion that the Beatles are the Alpha 
> and Omega. If the Beatles were the zenith by which all pop culture is based 
> there would have been a Beatles record on board....and to further illustrate 
> I must also add that Chuck Berry had a recording on that flight as well. 
> 
> > > 2) With the exception of Queen and The Dave Clark Five, The Beatles 
> >were nearly the last hold out to join the CD revolution. 
> > 
> >There were CDs when the Beatles and the Dave Clark 5 were recording? 
> >Can't say that I remember that. 
> > 
> > > 3) The Beatles "template" will not survive the Internet.....as they've 
> > > balked at the idea of MP3 downloads on any website other than Apple 
> >Records. 
> > 
> >I know nothing about what is or is not on Apple Records' website (okay, 
> >I didn't even know there was such a site) but every Beatle recording 
> >imaginable is available all over the net. 
> 
> Again, two examples to illustrate that the Beatles may have BEEN the 
> template (back to Josh's mail), but they no longer are. Once that grip on 
> popular music/culture/what have you slips from their grasp, time will 
> determine how they will survive the coming communications revolution. 
> 
> > > In 100 years the Beatles will be but a footnote. There will have been 
> >more 
> > > names and more FIRSTS to have overshadowed everything they did for 
> >those 
> > > brief 8 years. Just as Wayne Gretzky overshadowed Rocket Richard and 
> >Gordie 
> > > Howe...so too shall someone overshadow him. 
> > 
> >I am no more a seer than you are, so you could be right. Richard and 
> >Howe were hardly cultural touchstones (at least in the US), so Gretzky's 
> >catapulting over them in hockey's recordbooks is not a good analogy. 
> 
> Yes, it is. Richard and Howe were the definition of hockey during THEIR 
> period. They held all the records, scored all the goals, dominated the media 
> and defined what hockey was. Gretzky came along, beat the records and 
> popularized the game in the eyes of AMERICA....just like a little band from 
> Liverpool did. 
> 
> >What I do know is: we are 35 years into your 100-year period --- a fair 
> >ways, I am sure you will agree --- and I hardly see the Beatles on the 
> >road to being relegated to a footnote. 
> 
> Doesn't matter....I'll give you another 30 years from now and the result 
> will be the same. With the Internet levelling the playing field and popular 
> culture becoming but footnotes on the internet ("Click on the button marked 
> 1960's to see what Hippies and Viet Nam were all about"). 
> 
> We can get into a whole sociological debate about information, but that 
> won't change the fact that archives aren't being back-dated. We're moving 
> forward without taking stock of our past and only those with a boner for 
> nostalgia are keeping the spirit alive (I happen to be one of them...which 
> is why I wrote The Canadian Music Encyclopedia -- I live in a nation whose 
> entire 100 years of musical output has NEVER been measured.) 
> 
> I realize these are broad strokes, but the Beatles become merely trivia to 
> those who didn't live through their influence. They're not gods and their 
> accomplishments can only be measured by the culture that it affected. Once 
> all the boomers are dead and their children, and radio sinks into the tar 
> pit it now inhabits, The Beatles become just another band that gets played 
> on Oldies radio stations. 
> 
> And as for the assertion that "She Loves You" is some reigning beacon of the 
> band's enduring qualities, I offer the perennially more popular "Happy 
> Birthday" and defy 3 people on this list to name the author of that song 
> without doing a Google search. 
> 
> 
> Jaimie Vernon, 
> President, Bullseye Records 
> http://www.bullseyecanada.com 
> Author, Canadian Pop Music Encyclopedia 
> http://www.canoe.ca/JamMusicPopEncycloPages 
> 
> 
Message Index for 2004081, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help