Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004081, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From DanAbnrml9@aol.com
Subject Re: Another Beatles?
Date Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:17:09 EDT

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (0.9 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

In a message dated 8/3/2004 12:03:12 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
audities-owner@smoe.org writes:
 
<<In a word, "no."
There will never be another "sixties"  either.>>
 
Right... I think that's it exactly. This is giving in to hyperbole a bit,  
but I think I gave my answer last week with my post comparing No Doubt to the  
Beatles. No Doubt could've been the next Beatles, except for the fact that the  
modern workings of the industry wouldn't really let them be. Again, hyperbole 
 here... the point is you could throw almost any talented mainstream act into 
the  equation "__________ could have been the next Beatles", but the industry 
 standard is to not allow bands to develop to that point any longer. It's 
sad.  But are there still bands who are so talented? Of course... but again, if  
they're not allowed to develop, if they're actively DISCOURAGED from 
developing,  we never get to know. --Jason

Message Index for 2004081, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help