Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004081, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Stewart Mason <flamingo@theworld.com>
Subject Re: Another Bealtes?
Date Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:22:54 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (2.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

At 11:48 PM 8/3/2004 -0500, Michael Bennett wrote:
>Nothing like specific anecdotal evidence to refute a general statement. 

I was responding to Josh's equally anecdotal "I know 15-year-old kids who
are learning Beatle songs on guitar, because they love them."
 
>Some here may recall the Beatles #1 album selling millions of copies.  Which 
>isn't to say that the majority of teenagers don't know the Beatles, don't 
>know what they look like and just don't give a fuck.  But compare them to 
>anyone else in their era, and I betcha a significant percentage of teens buy 
>at least one Beatle comp.  What keeps the Beatles alive is what, in lesser 
>numbers, is going to keep The Velvet Underground alive amongst college and 
>graduate school age musicians for years to come -- the music connects.

I completely agree with every word of that paragraph.  But that's a much
smaller -- and I think much more reasonable -- statement than Josh's
over-reaching claims that "everyone" knows the Liverpool Lads.

>As for the Bennie Goodman/Dorsey/Sinatra, et al. comparison -- no one said 
>that The Beatles were the only group to engender a frenzied reaction.

But there have been implications that they were somehow the first group to
fuse different forms of music and then sell the results to a huge
teenybopper audience.  I was merely pointing out that it wasn't even Elvis
who did that first.

>Finally -- I'd agree with you that Josh's "She Loves You" test would fail.  
>But it's specious to claim that the artist who waxed two of the five most 
>recorded songs in history ("Yesterday" and "Something") wouldn't be 
>recognized by John and Jane Q. Public in substantial numbers.  Of course, if 
>your test was whether everyone recognized them, then I guess you win.

It wasn't MY test.  I repeat Josh's initial claim: "Its 40 years since "She
Loves You;" FORTY YEARS.  Walk down the street, sing a few bars, ask people
to identify the artist.  Hell, ask Lou Reed; he always hated them.  But
he'll get it. And don't just ask boomers; ask kids, old ladies, everyone.
Black, white, Latino, everyone."

Those were his words, not mine.  He's the one who said "everyone," and he
said it twice.

S





Message Index for 2004081, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help