Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004072, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From Stewart Mason <flamingo@theworld.com>
Subject Re: And a Partridge at a par three
Date Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:42:41 -0400

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

At 09:08 AM 7/14/2004 EDT, DanAbnrml9@aol.com wrote:
> 
>In a message dated 7/13/2004 9:36:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
>audities-owner@smoe.org writes:
> 
><<I keep hearing this, but I think it's one of their better  albums.>>
>
>I think so too. "Another Postcard" is a horrible single--probably the worst  
>one they've ever pushed--but beyond that song it's one of their most diverse 
>and  rich albums, playing better on repeat listens. 

A couple of other people have said equally damning things about "Another
Postcard," I think.  Why the antipathy towards this song?  Is it the
unashamed goofiness, something they haven't really indulged in on record
since GORDON?  Given that that's what first attracted them to me, I think
of "Another Postcard" as being kind of a nod to their roots.  Plus it's got
a great chorus.  I can see why it might seem slight next to a song like
"War On Drugs" or "Testing 1-2-3" (my personal favorite on the whole album,
partially because it sounds to me like it's at least partially about the
audience that latched onto "One Week" and then moved on and the band's
ambivalance about trying to chase them back), but I've always appreciated
the silliness.

S





Message Index for 2004072, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help