Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004064, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Billy G. Spradlin" <bgspradlin@cablelynx.com>
Subject Re: Robbs...licensing info
Date Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:59:09 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.1 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

At 09:28 AM 6/25/2004 -0600, you wrote:

>The main reason they can't do bonus trax is that many of the majors have
>policies regarding licensing their recordings to third parties where
>agreement is set up to *only* include what was on the original release.
>
>These are done to streamline, I believe, their legal work and make the
>application for many potential licensors easily applied to any of the indie
>labels they work with in licensing their lingering music assets.

My guess why the big boys do this is if a indie re-releases an album and it
sells well and gets rave reviews - that major can come out with a "deluxe
package" with the bonus goodies and recieve thier share of the glory. 

>Not Lame will be doing, increasingly, some catalog reissues w/ WEA and
>others in the coming years and almost all them will be like this----without
>bonus trax.  But they will have great booklets and liners and sound great.

I hope you have access to the Sire catalog - I would love to see the Beckies
and Pailey Brothers reissued.
  
Billy G. Spradlin
http://listen.to/jangleradio

Message Index for 2004064, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help