smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | Michael vg <govango@yahoo.com> |
| Subject | Re: review cliches...huh? |
| Date | Wed, 9 Jun 2004 07:20:07 -0700 (PDT) |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.3 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Funny you say this cause I always found BTO to be a prime
offender of that sort of reviewing at times.
I sometimes think it is because of the sheer volume of stuff they cover.
I still love the magazine, but many times after reading a review I would
just scratch my head.
michael
--- Matthew Marcinowski <matthew@beattheindiedrum.com> wrote:
> It's funny this topic was brought up. I was reading the brand spankin'
> new Big Takeover yesterday (long may Jack Rabid & friends live!) and I
> came upon a piece on The Unicorns. Within the 'interview' I found this:
>
> "Putting the Unicorns in a comparative context beckons another laundry
> list: They're some sort of an interplanetary hybrid between The Flaming
> Lips, They Might Be Giants, NRBQ, Ween, Kool Keith, The Strokes,
> Trachtenberg Family Sideshow Players, MF Doom, The Raincoats, Enon and
> the Beatles' (it)Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band(/it). With peanut
> butter icing on top."
>
> Eh?
>
>
> matthew
> np: The Ponys 'Shishimumu' el pee
>
> --
> "You can't be the Rolling Stones. You've gotta quit while you're
> relatively handsome." Bob Pollard 4-24-04
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.