Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004034, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: FOW- Mexican Wine AARRRGGGHHHHH
Date Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:35:37 -0600

[Part 1 text/plain (2.3 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)



> >
> >Look -- a lot of folks may think that Jocelyn is going overboard about 
>this,
> >but even though I recognized that the video was a parody/homage, I did 
>think
> >that some might find it sexist.  It's a valid (but arguable beef).
>
>It's an entirely valid point, and I never argued that it wasn't, but I also
>thought that Jocelyn's rant was about as over the top as the endlessly
>repeated claims that three-quarters of a second of a bejeweled nipple on
>live TV were going to lead to the downfall of western society as we know
>it.  The sins of this video can't take the weight of the argument presented
>against it, which made the argument sound rather spectacularly silly.

-- If you had made that point in the first place, that would have added to 
the discussion.
> >
> >Fuck, we've had lengthy discussions on the meaning of 'twee' and 'power
> >pop', so this attempt to diminish Jocelyn's meritorious point about a 
>video
> >by casting in a perspective that is outside the parameters of a music
> >discussion list is fairly specious.
>
>The political aspect was introduced by Jocelyn herself -- if that rant
>doesn't fall under the rubric of "sexual politics," then that term is
>meaningless -- and the idea that music, video (hell, culture in general,
>"popular" or otherwise) and politics are always entirely separate flies in
>the face of logic.  I ratcheted up the polemic by bringing in the Avignon
>President, true, but that element was already there.

-- On the other hand, your attempt to defend your original comment is as 
well-directed as a Condi Rice think piece.  Since what she wrote fell within 
the penumbra of sexual politics, it allowed you to make a comment on other 
political issues, which, as written, made it seem like she didn't care about 
issues you deem weightier?  This is akin to the 9/11 hearings -- when 
Richard Clarke was testifying, he was asked why he didn't make all these 
comments about Iraq in his testimony at a prior hearing -- the implication 
being that he was telling a different story.  His reply -- no one asked me 
about the Iraq war at the last hearing.

Mike Bennett
>S
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page – FREE 
download! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/


Message Index for 2004034, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help