smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | kcronin <fiatluxury@yahoo.com> |
| Subject | Re: Clear Channel does it again |
| Date | Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:02:44 -0800 (PST) |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.3 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
I idly wonder if some word came down from on high in
the post-janet's-supernipple-america that clearchannel
was going on the straight and narrow for awhile. and
then, maybe howard has finally worn out his welcome
and this is just a convenient excuse. on the other
hand, i don't think they should be censoring him, and
it does really amount to censorship, doesn't it, if
they own 60% of his audience? I mean, personally I
wouldn't give the man a piece of gum, but i've
successfully avoided listening to him for years...as
anyone could, who wasn't hellbent on being shocked and
appalled at the State of Things.
i know he was a big fan of Hum, and played their song
"stars" repeatedly on his show before it was really
all over radio (or as much as it ever got all over
radio.) The Hum boys were quite gratified by that.
--kelly
--- David Bradley <db65@mdc.net> wrote:
Didn't they ever listen to what they were
> putting on all
> those stations? It's not like that one episode they
> heard was a
> one-time situation. That's what his show is all
> about, and they're
> only now discovering this?
>
=====
arma non servant modum
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.