Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004023, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From ronald and karen sanchez <eldeluxe@mcn.net>
Subject Re: CD sales in 2003
Date Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:52:35 -0800

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (2.8 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

The reason for that is they spend so damn much money to make it "radio friendly" and then all the promo payola. I keep hearing from friends
"if we don't spend $60K to record, we aren't even gonna get a chance". If you spend more than $5K you are doomed I'd say.

RS

Josh Chasin wrote:

> Thanks, Jamie.  That's very helpful.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jaimie Vernon" <bullseyecanada@hotmail.com>
> To: <audities@smoe.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:01 PM
> Subject: Re: CD sales in 2003
>
> > At Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:13:19 Josh wrote:
> >
> > >A major label makes money selling a million units of a single release--
> but
> > >not, apparently, 20,000 units of 50 titles each.
> > >
> > >But this is product-centric thinking, and it is axiomatic that good
> > >businesses are consumer-centric.  Because I feel like the million sellers
> > >are bought by the guy who wanders into the record store 2 or 3 times a
> > >year,
> > >and the 20,000 sellers are bought by-- well, us.  Heavy purchasers.
> > >Shouldn't there be a way for a record marketer to target my share of
> > >wallet,
> > >as a heavy spender?
> >
> > Josh,
> > You've figured out what many of us have been doing for awhile - RHINO was
> > the first, I think, to take this tactic.
> >
> > My label's approach has always been to release more product, by more
> > artists, than the five major labels combined in a given year. We're
> sending
> > out 20 titles every quarter. A lot of them won't sell more than 200 or 300
> > units, but the REPEAT business is booming because we're attempting quality
> > re-issues and remastering packages. We're not everyone's cup of tea. Right
> > now we're scaling back signing new talent, but continue distributing
> > finished goods and completed projects requiring less capital
> > investment...thereby allowing us to tap into more talent, more audience,
> > more purchasers (or at least satisfying the same customers more
> frequently).
> >
> > So far it's working. Would love to have a million seller, but not at the
> > cost of excluding a lot of people who count on our output -- it's called
> > investing in the industry. We employee staff and keep a lot of
> > manufacturers, graphic designers, photographers and musicians working.
> >
> > Now, if the other labels would follow suit, the business would be a lot
> > healthier right now.
> >
> > Jaimie Vernon,
> > Bullseye
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
> >
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
> >

-- Ronald Sanchez
Director Of A&R
Career Records
 www.CareerRecords.com

The Donovan's Brain Web Site
 www.Donovans-Brain.com



Message Index for 2004023, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help