Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004022, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From harris <harris_mac@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: puzzling grammatical rule
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:21:47 -0800 (PST)

[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.2 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

alrighty:  that makes sense.  lets see if i can outdo myself with an even stupider question....do bands still release actual singles?   like, a good song, paired with a concession to the bass player?  or is a single more of a metaphysical notion wherein the label instructs ( or begs) the programmers which song to overplay next?

ArthurBang2@aol.com wrote:It's because they released "Clocks" as a single in 2003, that it was 
eligible for Record or Song of the year .. They wouldn't be able to win 
best album again, because the album came out in 2002, but since the 
category was for best song, any commercial single qualifies.

In The Mix w/ Arthur Bang
http://www.thepickle.net/

In a message dated 2/10/2004 11:08:17 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
harris_mac@yahoo.com writes:
how is it possible that coldplay won grammies in 2 consecutive years with 
material from a single album? how can this be? what loophole am i missing? 
also, does someone here know if any songs from the delightful 'school of rock' 
were at least nominated? thanks, harris


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online
Message Index for 2004022, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help