smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "David Bash" <bashpop@earthlink.net> |
| Subject | Re: women in rock/on the audities list |
| Date | Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:37:59 -0800 |
[Part 1 text/plain Windows-1252 (1.5 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
--- In audities@yahoogroups.com, garymaher@j... wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:00:16 -0500 audities-owner@s... writes:
> > I think men and women would have a lot more in common if society did
> not
> > try to pigeon-hole children from a very very young age.
>
> These "nurture" v. "nature" posts are making good points.
>
> We need to find some "musically virginal" boys and girls from a culture
> that doesn't push kids like we do, play them Rush and Celine, and see if
> there's any natural predisposition (nature) or if it's all societally
> learned behavior (nurture).
>
> Any sociomusicologists in the group? ;-)
>
> g
Well, I have a masters in Psychology and taught college-level Psych for
seven years, so...
Your idea is a very good one in theory, but in practice it would be very,
very difficult to find a culture that is totally devoid of all the possible
gender-based factors that could potentially bias this study. If somehow we
could raise kids from birth in a previously designed socio-gender-neutral
environment and then test them on their responses to Rush, Celine and other
supposedly gender-specific artists, then we might have something. However,
and no disrespect intended towards B.F. Skinner, even if something like this
*could* be done, there are many good reasons why the human race is better
off not "going there" with respect to totally controlling ones environment
from birth.
--
Freedom Rules!!!!!
Take Care,
David
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.