smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Jaimie Vernon" <bullseyecanada@hotmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: the protools debate |
| Date | Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:54:34 -0500 |
[Part 1 text/plain (1.2 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
At Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 01:43:52 Billy wrote:
> >Let It Be... Naked is a prime example of Autotune in use. Cher's
> >"Believe" is Autotune gone way crazy wrong.
>
>I think they used a Vocoder on those robotic sounding parts. It was a major
>"hook" for that song. Cher doesnt need auto-tune, she can be a great singer
>when she gets the right material.
No...it's the Autotune being used as an effect. It's a fringe benefit of the
device. I used it on my own solo album last year. The producer was
attempting to dial in the proper key for a song I was singing, he guessed
wrong and it caused the same vocal effect that's popping up on all these
records, since Cher started the wacky trend....however, I decided to not use
it on vocals after all and we attached it to the bass guitar part
instead....very bizarre, but effective if used sparingly.
Jaimie Vernon,
Bullseye
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.