smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "Kevin" <oddsmusic@comcast.net> |
| Subject | Pitch Correction specific examples |
| Date | Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:25:21 -0500 |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.3 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
ok, screw this. laugh. I'm just gonna give examples of what i'm
hearing and think to be pitch correction/etc and someone tell me i'm
right or wrong, i'm crazy or sane, what have you.
example a: the new Owsley, the opening track. His low vocals just
sound a bit computerized...like there's this underlying effect to it.
Now, is that pitch control or is that just a standard vocal effect? Cuz
i hear it on lots of stuff on the album, but it really stands out
there...
example b: The new pornographers, "The laws have changed." Especially
on the female singer parts...again, has the same feel as the above
Owsley. now, are they just using similar effects or is this pitch
correction?
-kev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: audities-owner@smoe.org
> [mailto:audities-owner@smoe.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 7:13 AM
> To: president@bullseyecanada.com; audities@smoe.org
> Subject: Re: the protools debate
>
>
>
>
> first off, thanks everyone for the education on the difference between
> protools and the pitch correction.
>
> I should have been a bit more specific when I asked who was using it.
> Since I don't *own* any Cher or N'Sync or Britney, what else
> besides the
> remastered Let It Be (from a powerpop standpoint) uses it to the point
> where its easy to hear?
>
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.