Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004012, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "David Bradley" <db65@mdc.net>
Subject Re: Reissue, repackage, repackage...
Date Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:15 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (1.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

> On the contrary, the 2 versions of the LOTR 
> installments were well publicized ahead of 
> time. The initial 2 disc versions were meant 
> for those who couldn't wait to get their grubby 
> mitts on a copy of the theatrical release 
> whereas the 4 disc versions were released 
> 6 months after the respective 2 disc versions 
> for those who wanted the "directors" cut. Also, 
> the extras added to the 4 disc versions were 
> different than those of the 2 disc issues, 
> thereby not replicating/displacing the early 
> versions.

I haven't gotten the 4-disc set of Two Towers yet, but the 4 disc set
of Fellowship Of The Ring deleted some lines from the 2 disc set's
version.  So while the 4-disc version gives you the added scenes and
therefore a longer movie, you don't have all of the the original
theatrical release. I'm wondering if Two Towers had the same thing
done to it...

----
Dave Bradley
web-accessed mail (most likely checking this from work)


Message Index for 2004012, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help