Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2004011, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "stevedurben2000" <Steven.Durben@cignabehavioral.com>
Subject Re: controversial songs
Date Tue, 06 Jan 2004 21:02:16 -0000

[Part 1 text/plain ISO-8859-1 (1.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

--- In audities@yahoogroups.com, Joe Field <joe@f...> wrote:
> We're talking 30+ years old now, but Seals & Crofts "Unborn Child" 
was 
> subject to a fair amount of controversy in the days around the 
Supreme 
> Court's Roe v Wade decision. The song took a definite 
> anti-abortion/pro-life stance---and pressure from special interest 
> groups got it pulled from most stations even as it was making its 
way on 
> the charts.


The one that came into my mind was similar in content and may also be 
to old.
Graham Parker's "You Can't be to Strong". Reportedly an Anti-Abortion 
song. If I'm wrong about this someone let me know.

More oldies..

Rolling Stones: Some Girls (steriotypes and misogony in one song)

Sex Pistols: really, take your pick.

Lou Reed: Walk on the Wild Side (just for getting on the radio)

Kinks: Lola (In it's day anyway)

Graham Parker: Mercury Poisoning: His kiss off to the label that done 
him wrong.

Some that just sprang to mind..

Steve


Message Index for 2004011, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help