Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003123, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "Mark Tate" <zumpp99@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: The new Owsley CD
Date Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:42:07 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain (2.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

Same initial impression here. I've only listened once and it did not hit 
home...


>From: <nonstoppop@cox.net>
>Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
>To: audities@smoe.org
>Subject: The new Owsley CD
>Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:31:46 -0500
>
>Normally, I’d start off an E-mail like this with “maybe it’s just me,” 
>except that I already know that at least one of my friends agrees with me, 
>so it clearly isn’t JUST me.  But the question I present to Audities is:  
>is anyone else disappointed with the new Owsley album?
>
>When I first put in the disc and it began to play, it sounded so little 
>like the Owsley I’ve come to know and love over the years 1999-2003 as I’ve 
>spun his self-titled CD over and over again…such a dramatic change (at 
>least to my ears) in both vocals and music…that, in my head, I quickly 
>began working up an elaborate explanation for the transformation that 
>involved a pressing error at the CD manufacturing plant.  Unfortunately, 
>when I heard the song title sung, I realized that, no, there had been no 
>error; this was, indeed, the new Owsley CD…and it was so bland that it 
>could’ve passed for everything else currently playing on the radio.
>
>Even worse, that first song, “Be With You,” is the one being pushed to 
>radio…so, apparently, the INTENT is to sound like everything else currently 
>playing on the radio.
>
>I’m not saying that Owsley doesn’t have the right to adjust his sound to 
>score greater commercial success if that’s what he wants and he feels that 
>that’s the way he can achieve it…but it doesn’t mean that I can’t be 
>disappointed about it.
>
>Overall, it isn’t that the album’s bad.  Indeed, I’m sure it’ll grow on me 
>after a few spins.  But, after the initial spin, it definitely didn’t live 
>up to my hopes and, yes, my expectations…
>
>Bummer, dude…
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of slow downloads? Compare online deals from your local high-speed 
providers now.  https://broadband.msn.com


Message Index for 2003123, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help