Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003123, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "David Bash" <bashpop@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Aerovons eligibility addendum...
Date Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:28:47 -0800

[Part 1 text/plain Windows-1252 (0.8 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

While I don't wish to go overboard with this, I should also offer the
following: several of the discs which many of us have included on our
"favorite reissues" lists have been comprised of mostly, or entirely,
previously unreleased tracks.  While this material was not originally
intended to be recorded as a proper album, and therefore is not eligible for
any "Best Of album" lists, its status as previously unreleased has never
stopped anyone from ranking them alongside reissues of previously released
material.  This, to me, is a good use of common sense, and it's another
reason why I think that The Aerovons disc is much better classified as a
reissue, despite its status as "previously unreleased", than as a 2003
release.

David


Message Index for 2003123, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help