smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
From | "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com> |
Subject | Re: albums, albums, where are you? |
Date | Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:38:45 -0600 |
[Part 1 text/plain (2.9 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
I think the problem with this discussion is that it's hard to frame it.
Putting aside concept albums, which ostensibly should play as a whole work,
I think the question is when is an album an album, instead of "Hey! We
finally wrote 12 songs and recorded them and put them on one disc!" In the
original USA Today article that spurred this thread, I was struck by Rob
Thomas of Matchbox 20 decrying the possible demise of the album, and
thinking, "As if Matchbox 20 had some great aesthetic statement to make over
the course of 45 minutes, as opposed to keeping the A & R guy happy."
I think what makes an album truly an album is a mixture of intent and
serendipity. The Clash are a good example. Starting with GIVE 'EM ENOUGH
ROPE through COMBAT ROCK, each album had a specific feel. Beyond the
distinct feel of each album, there is also, on the last three albums of this
sequence (LONDON CALLING, SANDINISTA! and CR), not just a diversity in
styles (and how!), but the albums have a flow that adds to the enjoyment of
playing them.
This isn't to say the best cuts on those records can't be separated -- I
don't think that the enjoyment of individual tracks separate from their
album context is indicative of how effective the album is as a whole. With
a great album, it's a case of the sum being greater than the individual
parts, even if some of the individual parts of the album are pretty great
alone.
In some cases, the greatness of an album is defined by a unity of purpose.
One of the best recent examples of this is Sparks' LIL' BEETHOVEN, which
takes a very specific approach and applies it in some different musical
contexts. I think I'd place The Cars debut record in that category too. In
other cases, it's the diversity of the material, weaved together with
thoughtful sequencing, that makes for a great full length listening
experience.
There are albums that have a lot of great songs that, IMO, don't make for a
rewarding full listen. One album that comes to mind immediately is Cyndi
Lauper's SHE'S SO UNUSUAL. I could certainly say that about a lot of power
pop albums that have come out in the last few years. Whereas REPEATER by
Splitsville is, to me, an album that has an ebb-and-flow and moves you
places, Lolas' SILVER DOLLAR SUNDAY, for example, is just a bunch of fine
songs put in one place. I love both these albums, but I think REPEATER more
fulfills the album experience.
As I finish writing that, I realize how difficult it is to tackle this topic
-- too much is dependent on how you personally respond to the disc. An
album is self-defining, and we have so many selves on this list.
Babbling, copping out and splitting --
Mike Bennett
NP: The Go -- THE GO
_________________________________________________________________
Get holiday tips for festive fun.
http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.