Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003122, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From "josh chasin" <jchasin@nyc.rr.com>
Subject Re: Rolling Stone top 500 vs. Audities top 500
Date Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:41:14 -0500

[Part 1 text/plain iso-8859-1 (2.5 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

An interesting insight into the RS poll is to look at the page where they
show who voted and how they tallied the votes.  I actually would be
interested in replicating the procedure on Audities but not so interested as
to make a federal case out of it.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Bennett" <mrhonorama@hotmail.com>
To: <audities@smoe.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: Rolling Stone top 500 vs. Audities top 500


> Not sure if we need to do such a poll, to confirm what we all know in our
> heart of hearts...that Jellyfish's two albums are the # 1 and # 2 albums
of
> all-time...
>
> OK, I'm just kidding (sort of).  While I think that an Audities list top
500
> would shed light on a lot of great albums, it would be subject to about as
> many bias and bouts of tunnel vision as the RS list.  No offense to all of
> us, since we're great, but the focus of this list (and, consequently, its
> members) is such that just as much worthy stuff might be left out.
>
> Beyond that, the other problem, from a realistic standpoint, is that if
> every single list member responded with, let's say, ten choices, while
there
> would be some that would garner a fair amount of tallies, due to the
> hardcore music loving types here, you'd get tons of albums that would get
> one or two mentions.  Realistically, once you got past the first 100 or
so,
> you'd probably only have albums that got very few tallies.
>
> Oh...and someone would have to compile it -- I'll stick with the top 20...
>
> Mike Bennett
>
>
>
> Record reviews and more at http://fufkin.com
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: mike vancha <mvancha@sasktel.net>
> >Reply-To: audities@smoe.org
> >To: audities@smoe.org
> >Subject: Rolling Stone top 500 vs. Audities top 500
> >Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:18:22 -0600
> >
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >I know it would be a lot of work but with the knowledgeable people on
this
> >list, I'd love to see a top 500 from our Audities people. That would be a
> >much better and accurate list, I would think.
> >
> >
> >Mike V.
> >
> >=======================================================================
> >Detailed Audities-List information:    <http://www.well.com/~reissue>
> >To manage your Audities List settings or unsubscribe:
> ><www.smoe.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?func=lists-long-full&extra=audities>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Our best dial-up offer is back.  Get MSN Dial-up Internet Service for 6
> months @ $9.95/month now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
>


Message Index for 2003122, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help