Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help

smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de

Message Index for 2003121, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

From DanAbnrml9@aol.com
Subject Re: Wal-Mart
Date Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:23:54 EST

[Part 1 text/plain US-ASCII (2.0 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)

In a message dated 12/4/2003 2:26:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
audities-owner@smoe.org writes:
<<It's easy and fun to point at Wal-Mart and say it's all their fault, which
> is why it's so popular to gang up on them.  But start talking about
infill,
> neighborhood renewal, mixed-use zoning laws, historical preservation and
> tax credits for downtown businesses -- you know, the stuff that actually
> *combats* urban sprawl -- and people's eyes glaze over.  Much like those
of
> 87% of those reading this thread.>>

I agree with Stewart more and more every day...

Maybe it's because we both live in Massachusetts, and we see the negative 
results of initially well-meaning measures to curb sprawl (mandating a minimum 
lot size to build a home, heavily restricting construction of both privately 
owned structures and public infrastructure, etc). For example, most of Boston's 
outer-ring suburbs demand that you own ridiculous amounts of land--over an 
acre, sometimes over two, which is a lot in the suburbs--
to build a house. The intention was that this would preserve "rural 
character" for these towns. Instead now we have outrageously wealthy suburbs that few 
can afford to move to and don't have the tax bases to upgrade roads and schools 
to accomodate the influx of residents. It also forced development out another 
ring--or two, or three--and caused people to have massive commutes on 
highways that were not designed for heavy traffic. These strict development 
laws--which exist in many Mass. towns--have helped make Eastern Massachusetts one of 
the most drasically overpriced parts of the country to reside. But if you tell 
these people who live in these towns; people who drive massive SUVs and feel 
that they've helped save the character of Massachusetts, about any of the above 
concepts that Stewart mentions, you'll merely get a rather typical NIMBY-ish 
reaction, only it'll be buttered by further self-righteousness. --Jason

Message Index for 2003121, sorted by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Previous message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)
Next message, by... (Author) (Date) (Subject) (Thread)

For assistance, please contact the smoe.org administrators.
Sign In Sign Out Subscribe to Mailing Lists Unsubscribe or Change Settings Help