smoe.org mailing lists
ivan@stellysee.de
| From | "M. Madler" <mrmadler@mc.net> |
| Subject | Re: let me be confused (was Re: Let it be. busted) |
| Date | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:49:38 -0600 |
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (1.4 kilobytes)]
(View Text in a separate window)
Jocelyn Geboy wrote:
clarification would be severely welcomed.
phil spector produced let it be.
he's known for intricate 'wall of sound' stuff.
***Correct.
then this 'let it be naked' record comes out. it's
produced by ____? no one? that's what i thought.
***According to the article by Greg Kot of the Tribune, it was
"engineers Allan Rouse and Paul Hicks (who) went back to the original
master tapes and reconstructed and resequenced the album from scratch."
then, there seems to be a *third* version? the
bootlegs?
***Yes. The bootlegs are usually the original "Get Back" album as put
together by engineer Glyn Johns and rejected by the Beatles in 1969.
These are songs recorded in the Apple studio in the second half of
January 1969.
Now, if you really want to get confused, there are also the bootlegs
that contain the songs and conversations from the early January
1969 sessions at the Twickenham film studios. Technically, these were
not recorded as far as The Beatles and Apple Records are concerned. The
source for the bootlegs is from the Nagra equipment on the movie
cameras. But none of that material has ever been put out by Apple on
either the Anthology 3 album or Let It Be - Naked.
NP: "As Nature Intended," The Beatles.
(For some reason I still can't find a copy of "Naked" in the near west
suburbs of Chicago.)
For assistance, please contact
the smoe.org administrators.